Taipei business district buildings under soft daylight

NextGen Software Tools

Fraud review and exception testing for ledgers that will not settle quietly.

Independent fieldwork for controllers, CFOs, and audit committees in Taiwan who need evidence-backed findings before the next board pack.

Flagship engagement

When a variance needs a second pair of eyes

Our fraud review engagement traces suspected misstatement, diversion, or irregular posting through bank evidence, journal paths, and authorization trails. Work stays concrete: sample, test, document, and report what the evidence supports.

Engagements typically run three to eight weeks from scoping, with on-site days in Taipei when records and people are here.

Review the fraud engagement
Hands reviewing printed financial statements

Related work

Engagements that sit beside a full review

Choose a focused piece of work when you already hold an exception list, need a walkthrough map, or are clearing findings from a prior review.

From the field

What clients notice after testing

They traced a cluster of late-month journals to a single approval path we had never stress-tested. The memo was blunt about what they could not prove, which helped us brief the committee without overstatement.

— Mei-Ling Chen, Finance Director, regional manufacturing group

Our exception log had grown for two years. The clearance schedule they returned finally told us which overrides still lacked evidence and which were noise. I wish we had narrowed the population before fieldwork; we lost two days on that.

— Robert Hsu, Internal Audit Manager

More client stories

Bright office interior with long work tables

How we work

Scope first, then sample with intent

Every engagement begins with a written scope: periods, entities, access, and the question under review. Testing expands only when patterns appear. You receive a draft findings discussion before anything is finalized for distribution.

See the engagement process